He's going like, I don't remember." His voice took a mocking tone, too. "Now the poor guy, you oughta see this guy - uh, I don't know what I said, uh, I don't remember. "Written by a nice reporter," Trump said in the speech. In 2001, Kovaleski, then with The Washington Post, and another Post journalist wrote a week after the 9-11 attacks about authorities in New Jersey detaining and questioning "a number of people who were allegedly seen celebrating the attacks." The story did not suggest "thousands" were celebrating, as Trump claimed, and a story then by The Star-Ledger in Newark, New Jersey, said the reports of such celebrations by Muslims proved unfounded.Įven so, Trump has pointed to the Post story as backing up his claim and took issue with Kovaleski's recent statement that he did not remember anyone alleging that large numbers of Muslims were celebrating. Trump has made unsubstantiated claims that thousands of Muslims in New Jersey were seen celebrating the attacks. Note that Trump first says the article was “written by a nice reporter.” (Kovaleski is indeed nice.) Then he could goes on to mock him, jerking his arms in front of his body: “Now, the poor guy, you ought to see this guy, ‘Ah, I don’t know what I said, I don’t remember, I don’t remember, maybe that’s what I said.Trump was challenging recollections by Kovaleski and many others about the 9-11 aftermath. Here, below, is a video of Trump speaking about Kovaleski on Nov. ‘I was wrong, I promise you, I made a mistake when I wrote the article.’ He was groveling, grovel, grovel, grovel.” And I said he’s groveling, he said, ‘no, no, the article, I was wrong on the article.’ I was doing a whole big number. Everyone know what grovel is? At the time I did the act, I did the whole thing with groveling. So I started imitating somebody – I didn’t speak to the guy – somebody that was groveling. I didn’t know it, I didn’t know it at all. The Fact Checker also contacted his co-author, Fredrick Kunkle, who said despite his shoe-leather reporting, the alleged celebrations could never be confirmed: “I specifically visited the Jersey City building and neighborhood where the celebrations were purported to have happened. Kovaleski, incidentally, was not the only author of the article. In other words, he was simply confirming what the article said-that “a number” of people were alleged to have celebrated, not thousands or even hundreds. Trump supporter Ann Coulter got wind of the report and wholeheartedly agreed: Perhaps Trump is not a subtle actor, but he’s utterly innocent of making fun of a disabled person. He simply said he did not remember anything that matched Trump’s description. Hes playing with fire: Former DOJ official on Trumps intimidation tactics. In other words, Kovaleski did not say he made a mistake and did not try to “change” the article. CNN reporter breaks down the results in Paxtons Senate impeachment trial. This is total fantasy, especially the suggestion that the Clinton campaign was upset and somehow got to Kovaleski and made him change his story. This is not good.’ So all of the sudden, the guy – I think the article was almost 15 years old-he starts changing the article, that he made a mistake, he this, he that.” Learn how we can prevent ableism from negatively shaping public perception. And obviously the other side of things started calling him also, saying ‘this article is not good, because this is sort of confirming what Trump is saying. When Donald Trump mocks a disabled reporter (Serge Kovaleski), it has an impact. During a defense of his widely debunked claim that thousands of. “The author of this article was this guy. Donald Trump has added a new item to his growing list of presidential campaign firsts: mocking a person’s physical handicap. “Allegedly” indicates there is no video footage or other proof that celebrations actually took place. The language in no way confirms Trump’s claiming of watching on television celebrations of “thousands” of Muslims. These cases notwithstanding, Trump has earned the ire of American disability organizations for his recent mocking of a New York Times reporter, who challenged Trump’s claims that thousands. Nope, not a single fact checker found this article to be significant. It was pretty much on point, not 100 percent, but pretty much.”
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |